在一些人看來，要成就一番事業，應該有高起點，高平臺，如果工作環境、條件一般，崗位平凡，很難脫穎而出，很難有什麼大成就。很多人就是在這種懷才不遇的自怨自艾中浪費了光陰，虛度了青春，就在這種不知不覺中度過了寶貴的生命。生命對每一個人來說只有一次，這僅有的一次應該怎樣度過呢？這是我們年輕人應該深刻思考的。但我要說，偉大正孕育在平凡之中，平凡的我們一樣能夠奉獻，無論在任何一個崗位，我們都應該充滿激情，無愧於我們的青春，因為激情孕育著希望，張揚著熱力。
XX年是不平凡的一年，延續兩年的經濟危機讓我們深深體會到發展程序的複雜和艱辛，眾多企業還沒有從“寒冬”中醒來。冬天的寒冷雖然刺骨，但陽光依然明媚，寒冷與溫暖交織而存，嚴冬孕育著春天的氣息。盤點我們共同走過的XX年，值得我們銘記的有太多太多：公司先進的經營理念始終貫穿著XX年的每一天，當金融危機波及實體經濟，全球性經濟寒冬來臨，我們公司依然保持了穩健發展，而且以更積極的姿態厲兵秣馬、逆勢出擊、決勝未來！許多許多的不平凡使公司在運營上不斷擴充套件，公司規模逐步擴大的前提下，依然做到了對員工負責、對企業負責、對社會負責，全面履行了企業所應擔負的社會責任，也為建設和諧社會做出了企業應盡的貢獻。
大河漲水小河滿，員工要快樂，必須有物質基礎，員工的物質基礎只能來源於企業的效益，企業沒效益，一切都是空談。企業強大，是員工富足的前提，而企業要在今日之競爭社會立足，並獲得長遠的可持續發展，沒有自己的核心競爭力又怎麼能強大的起來呢？制度化管理是一個企業做大作強的根基，沒有這樣的根基，做大做強就成了一句空話，員工的一切夢想也都成了海市蜃樓，但制度化管理必然會帶來工作壓力。面對壓力我們只有用自己的工作和奉獻去和公司一同的去擔當。
在新的發展機遇中我們必須要有改變，必須要有進步。你可以因為年齡、因為習慣，因為林林總總的原因進步的慢一些，但你不可以不進步，哪怕每天只進步一點點。百害而無一利的抱怨毫無用處。在平和的堅持中等待勝利！跟上企業的步伐，只有跟上企業步伐的人，才有機會與企業共享發展利益。
在工作中每個人都會遇到很多難以置信的挫折和失敗，從而面臨著許多考驗和挑戰，轉眼間我從參加工作到現在已有將近兩年的時間了，在這兩年當中我也同樣經歷了挫折和失敗，但我卻學會了面對和戰勝困難。在遇到困難、挫折，經歷過痛苦失敗後我也曾想過要放棄，但總是覺得很不甘心。在一次與朋友的交談中他的這麼一段話使我感觸頗深：“別輕易放棄！現在做什麼都不容易，你現在已經有了經驗了，如果轉行還得從頭來過，這樣下去，試問：你什麼時候才能得到一份自己感覺滿意的工作呢？”聽了這段話，我茅塞頓開，真是一語驚醒夢中人呀！失敗其實並不可怕，可怕的是經歷過失敗沒有勇氣繼續走下去，其實在每次的失敗中都會有很多值得我們去學習去深思的地方，失敗的次數也多，就說明我們離成功越近，所以我堅信，風雨之後終能見彩虹。經歷了這麼多之後，現在的我對自己的工作充滿了熱情和信心，相信在以後的日子了，只要腳踏實地的做好每一件事，生活就會一天會比一天更美好！
每一天，都是平凡的，但每一天也是精彩的；每一天都是瑣碎的，但每一天我都會認真對待。因為，既然我選擇了來這裡，我就會安心的在這裡更好的工作。正因為這樣，我要不斷熟悉各種規章制度，工藝範圍，加強業務知識學習，加強安全知識學習，逐步適應現有的工作環境，使自己逐步融入到生產集體中去。
回首XX年，我們走過了一段不平凡的歷程，展望XX年，新的一年開啟新的希望，新的歷程承載新的夢想。XX年是公司開拓創新、變革發展的一年，也是為品牌承前啟後的關鍵一年。機遇蘊含精彩，創新成就偉業。讓我們的XX年，揚帆遠航、譜寫華章！讓我們攜手並肩、滿懷信心地迎接挑戰，全力以赴、自強不息地向著更加高遠的目標，去續寫事業的華彩新篇！
TED英語演講稿：不幸也許是個機會機會演講稿範文（2） | 返回目錄簡介：殘奧會短跑冠軍aimee mullins天生沒有腓骨，從小就要學習靠義肢走路和奔跑。如今，她不僅是短跑選手、演員、模特，還是一位穩健的演講者。她不喜歡典中 “disabled”這個詞，因為負面詞彙足以毀掉一個人。但是，坦然面對不幸，你會發現等待你的是更多的機會。
i'd like to share with you a discovery that i made a few months ago while writing an article for italian wired. i always keep my thesaurus handy whenever i'm writing anything, but i'd already finished editing the piece, and i realized that i had never once in my life looked up the word "disabled" to see what i'd find.
let me read you the entry. "disabled, adjective: crippled, helpless, useless, wrecked, stalled, maimed, wounded, mangled, lame, mutilated, run-down, worn-out, weakened, impotent, castrated, paralyzed, handicapped, senile, decrepit, laid-up, done-up, done-for, done-in cracked-up, counted-out; see also hurt, useless and weak. antonyms, healthy, strong, capable." i was reading this list out loud to a friend and at first was laughing, it was so ludicrous, but i'd just gotten past "mangled," and my voice broke, and i had to stop and collect myself from the emotional shock and impact that the assault from these words unleashed.
you know, of course, this is my raggedy old thesaurus so i'm thinking this must be an ancient print date, right? but, in fact, the print date was the early 1980s, when i would have been starting primary school and forming an understanding of myself outside the family unit and as related to the other kids and the world around me. and, needless to say, thank god i wasn't using a thesaurus back then. i mean, from this entry, it would seem that i was born into a world that perceived someone like me to have nothing positive whatsoever going for them, when in fact, today i'm celebrated for the opportunities and adventures my life has procured.
so, i immediately went to look up the XX online edition, expecting to find a revision worth noting. here's the updated version of this entry. unfortunately, it's not much better. i find the last two words under "near antonyms," particularly unsettling: "whole" and "wholesome."
so, it's not just about the words. it's what we believe about people when we name them with these words. it's about the values behind the words, and how we construct those values. our language affects our thinking and how we view the world and how we view other people. in fact, many ancient societies, including the greeks and the romans, believed that to utter a curse verbally was so powerful, because to say the thing out loud brought it into existence. so, what reality do we want to call into existence: a person who is limited, or a person who's empowered? by casually doing something as simple as naming a person, a child, we might be putting lids and casting shadows on their power. wouldn't we want to open doors for them instead?
one such person who opened doors for me was my childhood doctor at the a.i. dupont institute in wilmington, delaware. his name was dr. pizzutillo, an italian american, whose name, apparently, was too difficult for most americans to pronounce, so he went by dr. p. and dr. p always wore really colorful bow ties and had the very perfect disposition to work with children.
i loved almost everything about my time spent at this hospital, with the exception of my physical therapy sessions. i had to do what seemed like innumerable repetitions of exercises with these thick, elastic bands -- different colors, you know -- to help build up my leg muscles, and i hated these bands more than anything -- i hated them, had names for them. i hated them. and, you know, i was already bargaining, as a five year-old child, with dr. p to try to get out of doing these exercises, unsuccessfully, of course. and, one day, he came in to my session -- exhaustive and unforgiving, these sessions -- and he said to me, "wow. aimee, you are such a strong and powerful little girl, i think you're going to break one of those bands. when you do break it, i'm going to give you a hundred bucks."
now, of course, this was a simple ploy on dr. p's part to get me to do the exercises i didn't want to do before the prospect of being the richest five-year-old in the second floor ward, but what he effectively did for me was reshape an awful daily occurrence into a new and promising experience for me. and i have to wonder today to what extent his vision and his declaration of me as a strong and powerful little girl shaped my own view of myself as an inherently strong, powerful and athletic person well into the future.
this is an example of how adults in positions of power can ignite the power of a child. but, in the previous instances of those thesaurus entries, our language isn't allowing us to evolve into the reality that we would all want, the possibility of an individual to see themselves as capable. our language hasn't caught up with the changes in our society, many of which have been brought about by technology. certainly, from a medical standpoint, my legs, laser surgery for vision impairment, titanium knees and hip replacements for aging bodies that are allowing people to more fully engage with their abilities, and move beyond the limits that nature has imposed on them -- not to mention social networking platforms allow people to self-identify, to claim their own descriptions of themselves, so they can go align with global groups of their own choosing. so, perhaps technology is revealing more clearly to us now what has always been a truth: that everyone has something rare and powerful to offer our society, and that the human ability to adapt is our greatest asset.
the human ability to adapt, it's an interesting thing, because people have continually wanted to talk to me about overcoming adversity, and i'm going to make an admission: this phrase never sat right with me, and i always felt uneasy trying to answer people's questions about it, and i think i'm starting to figure out why. implicit in this phrase of "overcoming adversity" is the idea that success, or happiness, is about emerging on the other side of a challenging experience unscathed or unmarked by the experience, as if my successes in life have come about from an ability to sidestep or circumnavigate the presumed pitfalls of a life with prosthetics, or what other people perceive as my disability. but, in fact, we are changed. we are marked, of course, by a challenge, whether physically, emotionally or both. and i'm going to suggest that this is a good thing. adversity isn't an obstacle that we need to get around in order to resume living our life. it's part of our life. and i tend to think of it like my shadow. sometimes i see a lot of it, sometimes there's very little, but it's always with me. and, certainly, i'm not trying to diminish the impact, the weight, of a person's struggle.
there is adversity and challenge in life, and it's all very real and relative to every single person, but the question isn't whether or not you're going to meet adversity, but how you're going to meet it. so, our responsibility is not simply shielding those we care for from adversity, but preparing them to meet it well. and we do a disservice to our kids when we make them feel that they're not equipped to adapt. there's an important difference and distinction between the objective medical fact of my being an amputee and the subjective societal opinion of whether or not i'm disabled. and, truthfully, the only real and consistent disability i've had to confront is the world ever thinking that i could be described by those definitions.
in our desire to protect those we care about by giving them the cold, hard truth about their medical prognosis, or, indeed, a prognosis on the expected quality of their life, we have to make sure that we don't put the first brick in a wall that will actually disable someone. perhaps the existing model of only looking at what is broken in you and how do we fix it, serves to be more disabling to the individual than the pathology itself.
by not treating the wholeness of a person, by not acknowledging their potency, we are creating another ill on top of whatever natural struggle they might have. we are effectively grading someone's worth to our community. so we need to see through the pathology and into the range of human capability. and, most importantly, there's a partnership between those perceived deficiencies and our greatest creative ability. so it's not about devaluing, or negating, these more trying times as something we want to avoid or sweep under the rug, but instead to find those opportunities wrapped in the adversity. so maybe the idea i want to put out there is not so much overcoming adversity as it is opening ourselves up to it, embracing it, grappling with it, to use a wrestling term, maybe even dancing with it. and, perhaps, if we see adversity as natural, consistent and useful, we're less burdened by the presence of it.
this year we celebrate the 200th birthday of charles darwin, and it was 150 years ago, when writing about evolution, that darwin illustrated, i think, a truth about the human character. to paraphrase: it's not the strongest of the species that survives, nor is it the most intelligent that survives; it is the one that is most adaptable to change. conflict is the genesis of creation. from darwin's work, amongst others, we can recognize that the human ability to survive and flourish is driven by the struggle of the human spirit through conflict into transformation. so, again, transformation, adaptation, is our greatest human skill. and, perhaps, until we're tested, we don't know what we're made of. maybe that's what adversity gives us: a sense of self, a sense of our own power. so, we can give ourselves a gift. we can re-imagine adversity as something more than just tough times. maybe we can see it as change. adversity is just change that we haven't adapted ourselves to yet.
i think the greatest adversity that we've created for ourselves is this idea of normalcy. now, who's normal? there's no normal. there's common, there's typical. there's no normal, and would you want to meet that poor, beige person if they existed? (laughter) i don't think so. if we can change this paradigm from one of achieving normalcy to one of possibility -- or potency, to be even a little bit more dangerous -- we can release the power of so many more children, and invite them to engage their rare and valuable abilities with the community.
anthropologists tell us that the one thing we as humans have always required of our community members is to be of use, to be able to contribute. there's evidence that neanderthals, 60,000 years ago, carried their elderly and those with serious physical injury, and perhaps it's because the life experience of survival of these people proved of value to the community. they didn't view these people as broken and useless; they were seen as rare and valuable.
a few years ago, i was in a food market in the town where i grew up in that red zone in northeastern pennsylvania, and i was standing over a bushel of tomatoes. it was summertime: i had shorts on. i hear this guy, his voice behind me say, "well, if it isn't aimee mullins." and i turn around, and it's this older man. i have no idea who he is.
and i said, "i'm sorry, sir, have we met? i don't remember meeting you."
he said, "well, you wouldn't remember meeting me. i mean, when we met i was delivering you from your mother's womb." (laughter) oh, that guy. and, but of course, actually, it did click.
this man was dr. kean, a man that i had only known about through my mother's stories of that day, because, of course, typical fashion, i arrived late for my birthday by two weeks. and so my mother's prenatal physician had gone on vacation, so the man who delivered me was a complete stranger to my parents. and, because i was born without the fibula bones, and had feet turned in, and a few toes in this foot and a few toes in that, he had to be the bearer -- this stranger had to be the bearer of bad news.
he said to me, "i had to give this prognosis to your parents that you would never walk, and you would never have the kind of mobility that other kids have or any kind of life of independence, and you've been making liar out of me ever since." (laughter) (applause)
the extraordinary thing is that he said he had saved newspaper clippings throughout my whole childhood, whether winning a second grade spelling bee, marching with the girl scouts, you know, the halloween parade, winning my college scholarship, or any of my sports victories, and he was using it, and integrating it into teaching resident students, med students from hahnemann medical school and hershey medical school. and he called this part of the course the x factor, the potential of the human will. no prognosis can account for how powerful this could be as a determinant in the quality of someone's life. and dr. kean went on to tell me, he said, "in my experience, unless repeatedly told otherwise, and even if given a modicum of support, if left to their own devices, a child will achieve."
see, dr. kean made that shift in thinking. he understood that there's a difference between the medical condition and what someone might do with it. and there's been a shift in my thinking over time, in that, if you had asked me at 15 years old, if i would have traded prosthetics for flesh-and-bone legs, i wouldn't have hesitated for a second. i aspired to that kind of normalcy back then. but if you ask me today, i'm not so sure. and it's because of the experiences i've had with them, not in spite of the experiences i've had with them. and perhaps this shift in me has happened because i've been exposed to more people who have opened doors for me than those who have put lids and cast shadows on me.
see, all you really need is one person to show you the epiphany of your own power, and you're off. if you can hand somebody the key to their own power -- the human spirit is so receptive -- if you can do that and open a door for someone at a crucial moment, you are educating them in the best sense. you're teaching them to open doors for themselves. in fact, the exact meaning of the word "educate" comes from the root word "educe." it means "to bring forth what is within, to bring out potential." so again, which potential do we want to bring out?
there was a case study done in 1960s britain, when they were moving from grammar schools to comprehensive schools. it's called the streaming trials. we call it "tracking" here in the states. it's separating students from a, b, c, d and so on. and the "a students" get the tougher curriculum, the best teachers, etc. well, they took, over a three-month period, d-level students, gave them a's, told them they were "a's," told them they were bright, and at the end of this three-month period, they were performing at a-level.
and, of course, the heartbreaking, flip side of this study, is that they took the "a students" and told them they were "d's." and that's what happened at the end of that three-month period. those who were still around in school, besides the people who had dropped out. a crucial part of this case study was that the teachers were duped too. the teachers didn't know a switch had been made. they were simply told, "these are the 'a-students,' these are the 'd-students.'" and that's how they went about teaching them and treating them.
so, i think that the only true disability is a crushed spirit, a spirit that's been crushed doesn't have hope, it doesn't see beauty, it no longer has our natural, childlike curiosity and our innate ability to imagine. if instead, we can bolster a human spirit to keep hope, to see beauty in themselves and others, to be curious and imaginative, then we are truly using our power well. when a spirit has those qualities, we are able to create new realities and new ways of being.
i'd like to leave you with a poem by a fourteenth-century persian poet named hafiz that my friend, jacques dembois told me about, and the poem is called "the god who only knows four words": "every child has known god, not the god of names, not the god of don'ts, but the god who only knows four words and keeps repeating them, saying, 'come dance with me. come, dance with me. come, dance with me.'"
thank you. (applause)
學生比賽演講稿：抓住機會，捨棄累贅機會演講稿範文（3） | 返回目錄生命成可貴，愛情價更高，若為機會故，兩者皆可拋。機會像雨後的彩虹，稍縱即逝;機會如動盪的股市，瞬息萬變;機會似繁雜的路口，轉眼不在。騎白馬的一不定是白馬王子，可以能是唐僧。我今天要演講的主題是：抓住機會，捨棄累贅。
俗話說：“機不再失，失不再來。”沒錯，機會貴就貴在它很多時候都只有一次。中央二套的《非常6+1》大家喜歡看嗎?裡面就有一個砸金蛋的環節。當有把從1到10號裡選好的號碼報給節目主持人李詠時，似乎你能做的就是等待塵埃落定，如果砸出金花四濺，恭喜你，圓夢成功;如果砸得有聲無物，很遺憾，感謝參與。可見，機會往往就近在咫尺。
機會可貴，值得珍惜。人們常說：“羨慕別人所得到的不如珍惜自己所擁有的。”我非常贊同這個說法。因為人各有所長嗎，當你盲目的追求別人所得到的同時也失去了自己本身所擁有的，悲哀!眾所周知的歌星周杰倫，當它在上四川音樂學院的時候，曾一度對籃球萬分痴迷，甚至有時上音樂課也強行要求老師讓他去玩籃球，無耐之下，老師不得已同意了。但是後來他發現自己玩籃球沒戲。身材差老遠了，不管是從平方的面積還是從立方的體積同見不到絲毫的優勢，混得再好，衝其量最多也不過是個nba 無人問津的替補。不得不恭喜他選擇了珍惜自己所擁有的音樂天賦，所以才成就了他億萬身份，家喻戶曉的知名度，在娛樂圈裡首屈一指，成為名副其實的影視泰斗。再來說說馬雲吧，馬雲，在阿里巴巴沒有上市以前，馬雲也是一個普通的大學生，但是改變他命運的儘儘是一次小小的機會。一開始馬雲和美國老闆恰談的合作並不順利，直到有一天，馬雲收到小道訊息，說是美國老闆要來北京玩。第二天馬雲立馬從浙江奔赴到北京熟悉環境，什麼吃喝玩樂，馬雲算是面面俱到、胸有成竹。當美國老闆來到北京以後，馬去可是十足的過了一把導遊的隱，詮釋了什麼叫做“尺地主之誼”。最後，老闆投資他的專案也是順理成章、不足為奇。也成就了淘寶在網上購物的壟斷地位。或許你本也可以像周杰倫、馬雲一樣揚名四海、叱詫風雲，只是你不懂得珍惜機會罷了。
或許你會覺得那樣的機會離你太遙遠，不切實際，那我就來說說離你近點的吧。在商場這種聲音你是否聽過：“走過路過的朋友，千萬不要錯過如此良機……褲子特價28元一條，猶豫徘徊，等於白來，徘徊猶豫，失去機遇”。像我今天這樣小小演講的機會，如果能撼動你、喚醒你對機會的重視，我演講的目的也就達到了。但是並不是所有的機會都值得珍惜，這就取決人的理性判斷。咱們試想：如果給姚明一個機會讓練110米跨欄情況會怎樣?結果是不言而喻，簡直是笑話，那不是強人所難麼?機會通常是指在人的能力範圍內，為了達到某個理論上可以實現的目的而努力奮鬥的行為。姚明對機會的認識是：只有抓住機會才能把比賽打好。是機會不是累贅，是累贅讓人頹廢。
機會不比時間，再怎麼擠也不一定會重現，就好比“破鏡不能重圓的道理”。機會往往會卷顧那些有準備的人，從現在開始做一個有準備的人。人生短短几個秋，不見機會不罷休。周星弛有一段經典的臺詞：“曾經有一份愛情擺在我的面前我沒有珍惜，如果上天再給我一次機會的話……”oh,no,sorry!我想對你說的是縱然你腰緾萬貫、才高八斗老天也不一定會再給你機會，因為老天爺是公平的!朋友們：抓住機會，捨棄累贅。努力學習吧!
幼兒教師演講稿：給我一個機會 還你一份精彩機會演講稿範文（4） | 返回目錄給我一個機會 還你一份精彩
下半年崗位述職報告
尊敬的園領導、聘任小組、各位老師，你們好！
一年一度的競聘上崗、展現自我的機會又擺在了我們的面前，今天的我有點激動，有的緊張。因為我擔任的這個班級有二年時間了，在這二年裡，我班的朗朗古詩聲傳遍了幼兒園內外，走進了電視；在這二年裡我班的“家園直通車”開進了每個家庭，走進了每位家長的心理；在這二年裡，我班的孩子活潑自信，和諧發展。而我與他們朝夕相處，早已是心心相印。而下學期是這些孩子在幼兒園裡最關鍵的一年，如何使他們永遠記住在幼兒園裡的快樂時光，如何讓他們充滿自信地走進國小的課堂。這是我這幾天一直在思考的問題。
新的世紀需要新的教育理念，新的世紀需要新的課程模式。小班化教育已越來越受到廣大教師、家長的青睞。本學期，我園嘗試開設小型班，這對我們老師是一個新的考驗，也是一次新的機遇，對於大班的老師更是一次新的挑戰。在此，我要求擔任大班小型班的班主任工作，在繼續做好班級常規的同時，把我班的專題特色搞得更加紅紅火火。
一． 繼續開展古詩誦讀活動
一個人如果他從來沒有讀過唐詩、宋詞，他就沒有資格說自己是一個真正的中國人。因為他無法融入中華民族的精神生活。孩子們從小接觸經典的古詩文，能開發記憶力，打好語言文功底，獲得良好的薰陶和修養，能對孩子的一生產生積極的影響。因此，在新學期裡，我們將繼續開展古詩誦讀活動，並在誦讀的基礎上，進行簡單的識練習，培養孩子早期閱讀的能力。在一定的階段進行成果彙報，古詩表演、古詩朗誦比賽、對詩等系列活動，當這些孩子走進國小的時候，都能出口成章，充滿自信。
二．繼續建立班級文化 辦好班級的另一特色——班報
幼兒園的工作離不開家長的配合，這句話我們每位老師都知道，可做起來就不是那麼一回事
。我們時常與家長交流，但真正將家長資源充分利用卻還不夠。我班的家長工作一直比較好，因為我們與家長有一塊溝通的平臺，那就是我們的班報——家園直通車，我班的班報，可謂是深入人手，每期都是人手一份，可最近我發現，我班的班報每期都是我們老師組稿，編輯，而屬於家長的位置就只有“聊天室”那麼一小塊，互動性不夠。《綱要》精神要求我們在教學中必須做到師生互動、生生互動、家園互動。因此，在新學期裡，我們將對班報進行全面改版，提供大量的空間，讓家長們暢所欲言，出謀劃策，學習交流。讓家長真正參與到我們的教學中來。小型班的家長，對孩子的教育比較重視，自身素質也比較高。只要我們多與他們進行心靈溝通、情感交流、換位而思，一定會贏得家長的理解和支援，我們的家長工作將會更順利展開，班報將會更加豐富多彩。
自始至終，在我的身上，總有一種東西在激勵著自己，那就是對幼教事業的熱愛。儘管歲月不饒人，儘管白髮染雙鬢，因為熱愛，所以責任在身；因為熱愛所以樂觀自信。我相信，這份熱愛，一定也會感染我的孩子們，讓他們從小擔當責任，充滿著自信。給我一個機會，還你一份精彩，這是我想對聘任小組和老師們表達的心聲。
謝謝！
三優範文網